The hearing examiner gave approval to a conditional use approval plan that was extremely light on the most basic details - how many data centers would be built at the site, where the immense amounts of water would come from to cool the centers.
MCA, in talks with the applicant has reached an agreement for two new conditions on the project:
- Groundwater will not be used to cool the data centers. The aquifer underlying the Reserve is the only source of water for the entire area and is already facing projections of drought. Check out our Good Gift Campaign.
- Back-up power will be provided by a Battery Energy Storage System, Natural
Gas Generators or some other source - not diesel generators that cause huge emissions. (The state allowed data centers to be completely exempt from emissions rules and have as many diesel generators running around the clock for back up power as they need.)
The applicant and hearing examiner continue to take public concerns less than seriously. The amendment refers to our Executive Caroline Taylor as a "concerned citizen" - downplaying her representation of many thousands of residents on who's behalf we work.
We set the record straight:
As a matter of clarification, my testimony, subsequent submission to the record, and the collaboration on these two additional conditions were on behalf of two County nonprofits as previously noted – Sugarloaf Citizens’ Association and Montgomery Countryside Alliance.
Efforts to diminish our concerns by failing to recognize the participation of two respected non-profits is troubling.
Next up: The project seeks exemption from County energy tax. Will the County Council be dazzled by this industry and the perception that it will deliver tax windfall? What independent analysis will be conducted to determine the cost vs benefits?
- Property consists of four recorded lots covering 758 acres located at the corner of Martinsburg Road, Darnestown Road and Dickerson Road.
- The conditional use “work” will be divided into “three land bays” and contained to the IH (heavy industrial) zoned portion of the property
- The Applicant is proposing and requesting general approval for the conditional uses on the property and if the Applicant receives the requested, the Applicant proposes submitting more detailed site plans modifying the conditional use at each phase. (see footnote 2)
Concern remains:
The number of data centers and their ultimate square footage has been left to future “modifications.” 1 data center or 5 or 10… unknown. Both MCA and our partners at Sugarloaf Citizens’ Association conveyed to the applicant, MC Planning staff and board, and to the Office of Zoning and Administrative Hearings (OZAH) our concern that the sketch plan lacks necessary specifics related to the project’s scope and resource requirements.
To be clear, we maintain that, especially without a regulatory framework to properly guide the data center industry in Montgomery County, providing a “general approval” casts a blind eye to potential cumulative non-inherent impacts of the full scope of the project. Would a hearing examiner approve a residential apartment project in Bethesda or Silver Spring without knowing the full square footage and occupancy allowing the applicant to come back later with a site plan and details?
MCA and SCA are considering our options, which could be a request for reconsideration or oral argument. Stay tuned.