MCA is challenging the Planning Board’s approval of a large suburban-style development on the last largest remaining farm in the Reserve, MCA filed a petition asserting error in the Board’s decision and respectfully asking them to revisit the matter. MCA challenges conformity with the Master Plan citing State legislation passed in 2009 that strengthens the requirement that land use decisions support and do not conflict with governing Master plans.
Breaking News: Developer has filed opposition to sending (remanding) the case back to Planning Board for their review and decision on MCA’s Petition for Reconsideration! Unbelievably, their filing claims that because the developer quickly filed their notice of appeal of the condition regarding tenant houses and density first…MCA’s petition for reconsideration should not be addressed. In other words, they are trying to prevent the process that allows for the Board to exercise their authority to reconsider matters when properly petitioned. This move is a real slap in the face to the community who merely seeks to ensure that the Board has fully evaluated the subdivision in light of the Master Plan and existing law.Stay tuned…
Breaking News: Developer has filed opposition to sending (remanding) the case back to Planning Board for their review and decision on MCA’s Petition for Reconsideration! Unbelievably, their filing claims that because the developer quickly filed their notice of appeal of the condition regarding tenant houses and density first…MCA’s petition for reconsideration should not be addressed. In other words, they are trying to prevent the process that allows for the Board to exercise their authority to reconsider matters when properly petitioned. This move is a real slap in the face to the community who merely seeks to ensure that the Board has fully evaluated the subdivision in light of the Master Plan and existing law.Stay tuned…
