Coverage of the first hearing from Bethesda Beat
(Ready to write to the council with our letter tool?)
A side by side comparison is instructive. Here is the Public Hearing Draft and the Current Final Draft. Because you likely don't have time to read through many hundreds of pages, we have done a word search for key terms that a plan guiding our county for the next decades should have. (Important to note that both plans have the same number of pages)
Word |
Public Hearing Draft (10/2020) |
Current Final Draft (4/2021) |
"action" |
332 |
50 |
"protect" |
65 |
33 |
"goal" or "goals" |
128 |
28 |
"equity" |
74 |
29 |
"resilience" or "resilient" |
66 |
18 |
"forest" |
21 |
11 |
"climate" |
95 |
35 |
"food" |
32 |
6 |
"growth" |
120 |
132 |
-So - just by the numbers, the Thrive 2050 plan in front of the Council, in comparison to the one floated for public comment:
- 85% fewer suggested actions
-Half the protection
-Setting 80% fewer goals
-About two-thirds less concerned about the climate
-60% less focused on equity
-10% more focused on growth
-80% less concerned about food - be that growing it or accessing it
-Half the concern for forests
-73% less concerned with resiliency, climate or other wise
Please take 2 minutes to sign a letter to the Council.