Mo-Co Alliance
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • A Brief History
    • Board & AC
    • Staff & Volunteers
    • Contact
    • Buy MCA Gear
  • About Ag Reserve
    • Growing Legacy Film
    • History of the Ag Reserve
    • Benefits of the Ag Reserve
    • Agriculture Education
    • Farm Facts
    • Threats to the Ag Reserve
    • A Place with Purpose
  • News
  • Events
    • Local Events
    • Royce Hanson Award
    • Ride for Reserve
  • Support Local
    • Agricultural Guide
    • Local Food Connection
    • Good Fences Grant
    • Community Supported Agriculture
    • Restaurants & Retail
    • Artists of the Reserve
  • Community Resources
    • Land Link >
      • Labor Link
    • Re-leaf the Reserve
    • PLENTY Magazine
    • Producer's Resources
    • BIPOC Farmer Guide
    • Directory of Local Services
    • Friends of Ten Mile Creek
  • Membership
    • Sponsors and Partners

News

Best Practices on Solar Underscore Farmland Protection and Conditional Use - Getting it Right Matters

1/22/2021

 
Picture
Update 1/26: The Sierra Club has reached out to MCA to insist that the best practice for solar siting information we pulled verbatim from their own website in this post below is "misinformation". More on that here.  
Local experts have best practices that can inform the path toward solar in Montgomery County: According to Chesapeake Bay Foundation's Seven Keys to Developing Environmentally Friendly Solar Power in the Chesapeake Bay Region  #4 - list solar facilities as a “conditional” or “special exception” land use.  

The Montgomery County Hearing Examiner has weighed in to correct some misunderstandings about the conditional use process. See her correspondence here. 


Read on for more best practices from Sierra Club, CBF, and other jurisdictions that are currently building community solar under conditional use. 
 As long as there has been energy generation there has been the issue of where to site it. 

Solar energy generation (in its current form) relies on flat sunny surfaces. Agriculture, since the practice began, has also relied on flat, sunny soil.  Wise planners saw the potential conflict between these land uses long ago and began to find ways to balance the need for renewable energy and agriculture.  

ZTA 20-01- that would allow 3 square miles of industrial solar in Montgomery County's Agricultural Reserve on productive soils and provide scant protections for forests or water quality - is coming up for a vote at the County Council on 1/26.

​This provision has not taken advantage of the best practices of experts or other area jurisdictions that are siting the very same community solar we are after on degraded lands and through conditional use, taking care of productive soils.  
There is still time to ask the council to use best practices in siting solar in MoCo.  Take Action Here
Solar Siting Best Practices According To....
The National Sierra Club Position on Energy Facilities Siting and Ag/Food
​Update - Sierra Club has said the previously quoted  siting policy on their website is not accurate as it is from 1978  (but accessed on their website this week but as of 1/29/2021 it has been taken down). According to their email, this is the updated solar policy. (solar parts highlighted by MCA). This policy does not mention ground mounted solar however on p 13 seems to set a preference for rooftop solar: ​

"Many opportunities exist in and adjacent to our communities for the local, smaller-scale application of renewable technologies (such as rooftop solar). Distributed clean energy involves the entire community in energy solutions, and reduces transmission impacts and disruptive transmission bottlenecks. The Sierra Club supports properly sited and designed local and district energy projects, and calls for measures to ensure that local, smaller-scale projects have access to the transmission and distribution system. Because distributed generation generally takes place in an urban or otherwise developed environment, serious siting problems or unacceptable environmental impacts are uncommon."
Thanks to a Sierra Club member who sent along the National Sierra Club's stance on Agriculture and Food (dated 2015). Of Note: 
Land Use: The Sierra Club supports policies that protect productive agricultural land from urban, industrial, and mining development and prevent the conversion of wildland areas to agricultural use. 1. In general, land currently used for agricultural production in ways which protect longterm resource productivity should not be converted to other functions. 2. In areas not now in agricultural use, land-use classifications (including the identification of prime soils) and policies should be developed and implemented before conversion is permitted. 3. Those seeking to convert agricultural land to other uses, whether or not it is currently in active production, should bear the burden of proving that the proposed new use is more important to current and future public welfare and that no other location is feasible that would avoid loss of agricultural land; short-term economic gains to a few individuals are not sufficient grounds for reducing our stock of agricultural land. 4. Although the Sierra Club does not generally support the conversion of wildlands to agricultural use, each proposal must be evaluated on the basis of both the land’s importance for wildlife habitat and watershed protection and the characteristics of the proposed agricultural use. 5. It is important that there be wide public and professional participation in the planning process and that farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural professionals participate in land-use decisions. 6. Land-use planning should preserve cultural access rights and promote indigenous landuse and agricultural practices. 7. Zoning and land-division policy and practice should be structured to proactively protect prime agricultural lands from conversion to other uses.
The Maryland Sierra Club Presentation on Solar Siting Guidelines
​Good Local Solar Policy is one that (Per Dr. Al Bartlett, Member of the Solar Working Group): 
  • "supports, promotes, and maximizes economically feasible use of" non ag land
  • "defines what land should not be used, favoring 'marginal' land over prime productive (USDA Class 1-3) land"
  • "promotes or requires agriculture-friendly practices"
  • "assures adequate, timely public notification and input"
The Policy Process:
  • "Such a policy would promote greatest feasible solar development on available non-agricultural sites, including rooftops, landfills, and brownfields... Most importantly, it allows the locality to define (ideally, through public discussion) what types of land it wants to exclude from the small amount that solar development will require... To the greatest extent possible, policy should favor use of lower quality land over prime and productive land used for farming."
  • "It should include requirements of solar developers for adequate and timely notification of residents - those near a proposed project site, as well as the community at large. This requirement should include an adequate public hearing as part of the review process."
Chesapeake Bay Foundation 

"Where Solar Shouldn't Go is as Critical as Where it Does Go" -
Bay Journal OpEd by CBF Land Use Director Lee Epstein 12/20

CBF White Paper "Principles and Practices for Realizing the Necessity and Promise of Solar Power"
  •  "Either conduct statewide or local solar facility siting studies. "
  • "“Community solar” facilities may also be acceptable, if they avoid high quality environmental resources and are not placed on prime farmland or replace forest and woodlands. "
  • "Avoid location of solar facilities on prime agricultural soils. Any solar operations on lesser quality agricultural fields must not negatively affect the land and soil that could prevent active farming in the future"
  • "At the local level (where appropriate under state law), list solar facilities as, and use the review and approval process for, conditional or special exception uses. "
Local Jurisdictions Siting Community Solar as a Conditional Use - and the Community  Solar Projects Being Built There
Baltimore County - Conditional Use  
​Projects -
Owings Mills 
Kingsville 
Dogwood (Now Closed w/700 subscribers)
​
​Howard County 
-  Conditional Use 
Projects: 
West Friendship
​Hanover


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Categories

    All
    Action
    Barnesville Oaks/Greentree
    Bike
    Climate Change
    CSA
    Development
    Education
    Energy
    Events
    Fun!
    Growing Legacy
    Land Link
    Local Food
    Master Plan Update
    Mega Church
    Montgomery Council
    News
    Open Space
    Outer Beltway
    Parks
    Planning
    Potomac Bridge
    Racial Justice
    Recent Accomplishments
    Recipes
    Reducing Waste
    Regenerative Ag
    Releaf
    Rocklands
    Rural Schools
    Sewer
    Solar
    Take Action Now
    Ten Mile Creek
    Thrive 2050
    Transporation
    Water

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2012
    September 2012
    November 2010
    October 2010

ABOUT US
What We Do
A Brief History
Board & AC
Staff & Volunteers
Contact
​​Buy MCA Gear
ABOUT Ag RESERVE
History of the Ag
Benefits of the Ag
Farm Facts
Threats to the Ag
​A Place with Purpose
NEWS
EVENTS
Local Events
Ride for the Reserve
Royce Hanson Award
SUPPORT LOCAL
Ag Guide
Local Food Connection
Community Supported Agriculture
Restaurants & Retail
​Artists of the Reserve
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
​Land Link
Producer's Resources
Directory of Services
Picture
Montgomery Countryside Alliance
P.O Box 24, Poolesville, MD  20837
301-461-9831  •  ​info@mocoalliance.org
Picture
Picture
Picture

Picture
MCA is proud to announce that we have been recognized for a third time as one of the best small charities in the D.C. region by Catalogue for Philanthropy: Greater Washington. A panel of 110 expert reviewers from area foundations, corporate giving programs, and peer non-profit organizations evaluated 270 applications.

​MCA is known as an effective and innovative non-profit whose efforts to preserve and promote Montgomery County’s nationally recognized 93,000 acre Ag Reserve have brought increased public and governmental support of local food production and farmland and open space preservation. Most importantly, MCA’s efforts are putting more farmers on the ground and keeping them there.
COPYRIGHT © MONTGOMERY COUNTRYSIDE ALLIANCE 2008